Conferences

outputs_in

Conferences

17 June, 2026

“Proportional Brain Flow” in the Context of Digital Globalization

In this article, Prof. Dr. Azamat Seitov analyzes new forms of intellectual migration in the context of digital globalization. The author’s central argument is that today, the “brain drain” is no longer limited to the physical departure of specialists abroad. Due to remote employment, digital platforms, and opportunities to work online for foreign companies, human capital can serve another country's economy while remaining within its home country. The article demonstrates that the traditional concepts of “brain drain”, “brain gain”, and “brain circulation” are insufficient in the era of the digital economy. Therefore, the author proposes the concept of “proportional brain flow”, or an intellectual flow proportional to the donor country. This approach allows for an assessment of how much of a specialist's knowledge, time, and intellectual labor serves the foreign market versus how much contributes to the national economy, science, and scholarship, even while the specialist physically resides in Uzbekistan. The article emphasizes that this issue is particularly relevant for Uzbekistan and Central Asia. In fields such as programming, data analytics, design, scientific research, and consulting, the trend of young specialists orienting toward foreign markets is intensifying. While this expands opportunities for income and experience, it can also create hidden losses for the national knowledge economy. This is because the costs of training a specialist are borne by the country, while their primary economic value benefits foreign companies. In conclusion, the author advocates for rationally managing intellectual migration rather than restricting it. The most optimal path for Uzbekistan is to link the international remote employment of its specialists with national projects, research centers, technology clusters, startups, and universities. In this way, foreign experience and participation in the global labor market can be transformed into a resource that develops the national innovation ecosystem. * The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.

outputs_in

Conferences

19 February, 2026

Digital Employment Trends in Uzbekistan: Challenges and Opportunities

In an article by Mushtariy Usmonova, published in a collection of materials from the international conference “Digitalization and Transformation of the Social Order in Central Asian Countries” (Astana, 2025), the author analyzes the transformation of the country's labor market in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The author considers digitalization as a key driver of structural changes in the economy, the formation of platform employment, and the growth of the global gig economy, which challenge traditional models of labor organization and social protection of workers. Particular attention is paid to the national dynamics of Uzbekistan's digital economy. Usmonova emphasizes that the “Digital Uzbekistan – 2030” strategy and the active development of the IT sector are creating conditions for the country to become a regional IT hub. The growth in the gross value added of the industry, the expansion of digital services exports, and institutional support through IT Park testify to the formation of a new employment segment and the emergence of the “IT class” as a socio-economic phenomenon. The article details the key trends in digital employment: a sharp increase in the number of self-employed people, the spread of remote work and freelancing, and the inclusion of Uzbek specialists in international digital labor networks. The author shows that the digital sector is becoming an important source of income for young people and new professional groups, while identifying problems of regional inequality, a shortage of skilled workers, and insufficient social protection for platform workers. Concluding the study, Usmonova highlights both the challenges and significant opportunities of digital employment for the sustainable development of Uzbekistan. The digital economy is seen as a tool for diversifying exports, expanding labor inclusion for women and youth, developing regions, and forming a new middle class. The article is an important contribution to understanding the socio-economic consequences of digital transformation in Central Asia and the prospects for labor market modernization. * The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.

outputs_in

Conferences

19 February, 2026

Digitalization and Its Impact on the System of Knowledge Production and Power: A Philosophical Analysis

In an article by Rustam Makhmudov, a Leading Research Fellow at the Laboratory of Anthropology and Conflict Studies, published in a collection of materials from the international conference “Digitalization and the Transformation of the Social Order in Central Asian Countries” (Astana, 2025), digitalization is considered a fundamental process that radically changes the nature of knowledge, mechanisms of power, and institutional governance. The author shows that the digital age is destroying the old industrial models of knowledge production based on hierarchical structures and forming a new networked reality where algorithms, platforms, and artificial intelligence are beginning to play a key role. Particular attention is paid to the philosophical understanding of the hybridization of Karl Popper's “three worlds” and the technological worlds of the digital environment. Makhmudov emphasizes that modern knowledge is becoming an emergent effect of complex interactions between humans, digital objects, and autonomous algorithms. In this logic, algorithms cease to be neutral tools and become co-creators of norms, institutions, and new forms of social reality. The article also analyzes the transformation of power in a digital society, where power is increasingly shifting from traditional actors to networks, algorithmic decision-making centers, and hyperreality as a space for managing attention and behavior. The author shows that digital power is becoming distributed, opaque, and post-humanistic, requiring a rethinking of classical notions of legitimacy, responsibility, and control. Concluding his study, Makhmudov identifies education as a key infrastructure for anticipating and adapting to nonlinear technological transitions. In the context of accelerating change, the education system must develop the meta-skills necessary to navigate new digital trajectories, ensuring a balance between technological development, ethical design, and social sustainability. The article is an important contribution to the humanistic understanding of digital transformation and its long-term implications for Central Asia. * The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.

outputs_in

Conferences

16 January, 2026

The Renewable Energy Chessboard: Central Asia between China, Russia and the EU

In their article, published by Rosa Luxembourg Foundation’s Representative Office in Central Asia as proceedings of the international conference on “Central Asia in the Face of Global Economic Transformation: Assessment and Forecasting”, organized jointly with UWED, Ubaydullo Khujabekov and Ashwin Raghuraman examine how renewable energy has become a strategic arena in which Central Asian states navigate competition among major external actors. The authors argue that green energy is no longer merely a developmental priority, but a geopolitical instrument through which countries such as Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan seek to diversify partnerships, strengthen sovereignty and reduce long-standing structural dependencies. The article contrasts the approaches of the three key players shaping the region’s energy landscape. Russia and China are portrayed as providers of immediate, tangible solutions through legacy infrastructure, fossil fuel supplies and fast-moving investment projects, albeit at the cost of deepening dependency. By contrast, the European Union advances a longer-term, governance-oriented model under initiatives such as Global Gateway, linking renewable energy investment with regulatory reform, transparency and sustainable development standards. Ultimately, the authors show that Central Asian states are not passive objects of great-power rivalry. Instead, they actively balance these competing offers, leveraging renewable energy to pursue a multipolar energy future that enhances resilience, policy autonomy and regional cooperation. The article positions green energy as a key strategic lever through which Central Asia can redefine its role in the evolving Eurasian and global order. * The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.

outputs_in

Conferences

16 January, 2026

Overall Assessment of Global Challenges to Security and Stability in Central Asia

In an article by Rustam Makhmudov, Leading Research Fellow at the Laboratory of Anthropology and Conflict Studies, published in a collection of materials from the international conference “Central Asia Facing the Challenges of Global Economic Transformation: Assessment and Forecasting”, organized by UWED in partnership with the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation’s Representative Office in Central Asia, offers a comprehensive interpretation of global challenges to security and stability in Central Asia in the period up to 2030–2040 through the prism of Giovanni Arrighi's theory of systemic cycles of capital accumulation. The author proceeds from the thesis that the modern world system is undergoing profound structural transformations associated with the weakening of American hegemony, increased competition between the US, China, the EU, and the countries of the Global South, as well as the acceleration of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The article pays particular attention to the analysis of US policy, primarily during Donald Trump's presidency, which the author views as an attempt to prevent the transition of the American accumulation cycle from a “signal” to a “terminal” crisis. To this end, Makhmudov uses three analytical indicators, “profit norm,” “Lippmann gap,” and “determination indicator”, to assess the ratio of US resources to global obligations, the level of their institutional stability, and their capacity for structural economic restructuring. It is shown that the growth of financialisation, public debt and foreign policy commitments increases the risks of systemic turbulence at the global level. In the regional dimension, the author emphasizes that the key threats to Central Asia are the vulnerability of logistics and trade chains, a possible shift in the balance of external forces, risks of destabilization in the security sphere (including those related to the situation in Afghanistan), and restrictions on access to advanced technologies. At the same time, the weakening of the dominant center of the world system opens new opportunities for the countries of the region, primarily to strengthen their own agency, deepen regional consolidation, and position themselves more flexibly in the emerging multipolar order. Rustam Makhmudov concludes that the stability and security of Central Asia in the context of global transformations will depend on the ability of the countries of the region to combine a strategy of balancing external actors with the development of their own economic, technological, and institutional potential. Such an approach, according to the author, will not only minimize risks, but also allow the current turning point to be used to strengthen Central Asia's role in the new architecture of international relations. * The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.

outputs_in

Conferences

13 December, 2025

Hamza Boltaev speaks at Kabul seminar on Afghanistan–Uzbekistan relations

Hamza Boltaev delivered a speech at the seminar “Afghanistan – Uzbekistan Relations: Opportunities and Future Scenarios”, organised by the Center for Strategic Studies of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan in Kabul on 23 November. The discussion brought together ministry staff and experts to exchange views on the future of bilateral ties and practical areas for cooperation. In his remarks, Mr. Boltaev emphasised the value of regular expert dialogue and academic cooperation as a steady way to strengthen mutual understanding and develop realistic proposals. He noted that research exchanges, joint seminars, and professional networks can support closer contacts between institutions and help both sides identify shared interests in a calm, constructive format. During the Q&A, participants raised questions about how to make cooperation more convenient in practice, particularly on mobility and travel procedures, as well as trade and cross-border logistics. Mr. Boltaev underlined that some issues are decided at the governmental level, while his own contribution as a researcher is to support partnership through analysis, dialogue, and educational ties that build long-term trust. He also stressed that expanding economic ties works best when it is done step by step, in a way that encourages trade and new opportunities while keeping a sensible balance with domestic priorities. Overall, his speech highlighted a simple message: sustainable Afghanistan–Uzbekistan cooperation grows fastest when it is built on practical communication, gradual progress, and strong links between experts and institutions. * The Institute for Advanced International Studies (IAIS) does not take institutional positions on any issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IAIS.